2010-11-17
We apologize for the inconvenience.
2010-11-12
Hæc bilanx pendet in loco qui non est
2010-11-10
Divide, add, multiply and extract square roots. There will be a test at the end of the Æon.
2010-11-09
Cumulative catalogue of Celephaïs Press titles
- Phallism: A Description of the Worship of Lingam-Yoni &c. &c. &c. (Crux Ansata) (based on 1892 "second edition")
- Ophiolatreia, or Serpent Worship
- Phallic Objects, Monuments, and Remains
- Cultus Arborum, or Phallic Tree Worship
- Fishes, Flowers and Fire and elements and deities in the phallic faiths
- Archaic Rock Inscriptions
- Nature Worship
- Mysteries of the Rosie Cross
- Phallic Miscellanies
- The Masculine Cross, or a History of Ancient and Modern Crosses (not to be confused with two earlier works of a similar title).
-- Book 4 (part I).
-- Book 4 (part II).
-- The Equinox of the Gods (was designated part IV of Book 4 some time after publication)
-- Konx Om Pax, Essays in Light.
-- Little Essays Towards Truth.
-- Magick in Theory and Practice (part III of Book 4).
-- Tannhäuser.
-- (ed.) Manual of the Degrees of the Antient and Primitive Rite.
2010-11-08
Book of the Beginnings, continued.
2010-11-07
Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar (2)
Going back through the blog archives, I discover that I omitted to mention at the time (back in March) that I completed and posted on Scribd an edition of Phallism in Ancient Worships (a.k.a. Ancient Symbol Worship) by Hodder M. Westropp, C. S. Wake, and Alexander Wilder. The two essays comprising the bulk of this were originally papers presented to a dodgy bunch of blokes called the Anthropological Society of London, who were also the original audience for Edward Sellon's ramblings on Indian "phallic worship." On which subject, I've just uploaded a slight update of Sellon's Annotations on the Sacred Writings of the Hindus. This mainly fixes a few previously unnoticed OCR errors in the "S'akti Puja" paper, and slightly expands one of my notes.
As I almost got round to explaining in a post last year under this title, what started me on the trek through this morass, which with the CP release of Ancient Faiths Embodied in Ancient Names is more or less over (I do not count Gerald Massey or Godfrey Higgins as Phallicists) was my interest in the works of the English occultist Aleister Crowley, and the quasi-Masonic association the Ordo Templi Orientis, which he took over in the 1920s and which is now widely associated with his name and ideas.
Theodor Reuss, the founder of the O.T.O., echoing the words of Thomas Inman's Symbolism, claimed for his order the possession of a "KEY" to explain all religious, Masonic and Hermetic symbolism, namely "the teaching of sexual magic." Crowley, who even prior to his association with Reuss was at least aware of the Phallicist school of History of Religions, enthusiastically embraced this scheme of interpretation, and while keeping the precise nature of this teaching a secret, reserved for the higher degrees of the order, recommended works like General Forlong's Rivers of Life, Payne Knight et al. on the Worship of Priapus, and Hargrave Jennings' The Rosicrucians to his students even in writings intended for publication.
There is one very important difference between Reuss and Crowley on the one hand, and Dr. Inman in particular on the other. The Doctor, whose own religious position seems to have been a vague Theism, revering a self-contradictory abstraction he called "the Almighty" and rejecting any kind of religious symbolism or ritual as a blasphemous insult to the divine majesty, used the presence of supposed "phallic" elements in the doctrine, ritual, iconography and nomenclature of existing religions as grounds for violently denouncing them. Reuss and Crowley, on the other hand, accepting the arguments of the Phallicists as to the intimate and indissoluble connection between sexuality and religion, deduced from these the divinity of the human sexual instinct and the "solar-phallic" cult as the one true religion:
[In] the Macrocosm is one sole God, the Sun [. . .] in the Microcosm, which is Man, the vicegerent of the Sun, sole giver of Life, is the Phallus.
-- Crowley, Liber 228, "De Natura Deorum."
[The] only rational God is the Sun, who is in the Macrocosm what the Phallus is in the Microcosm.
-- Crowley, Liber 888, "The Gospel according to St. Bernard Shaw."
2010-11-06
Book of the Beginnings, further progress of a sort.
2010-11-05
In Man we Trust? (5)
Ah, and I see we have "followers" again. 298 so far.
2010-11-04
A Book of the Beginnings (progress of a sort report)
Ironies abound . . .
2010-10-14
In Man we Trust (4)
Another point to consider when noting apparent contradictions in this book, is this: Inman was writing long before the age of desk-top publishing. Setting a book of 1800 octavo pages up in type is not a quick or simple task, and once a section of the book had been typeset, it would not have been as straightforward a task to change it as it would be to go back and change a document in a word processor. Inman's ideas and views continued to develop and in some respects change over the course of however many years he was working on Ancient Faiths (a paper on aspects of his theories in regard to English personal names was presented to the Liverpool Literary and Philosophical Society in February 1866, and printed in vol. XX of the Society's Proceedings), and even after vol. 1 had been printed.
2010-10-11
In Man we Trust (3)
Vol. 1
Vol. 2
It appears, looking at the date stamps on some of the workfiles, that I started on this re-set over six years ago; that I ever finished it can only really be attributed to some bizarre kind of intellectual sadomasochism. While I could fill many pages with detailed pedantic criticisms of the Doctor's methods and conclusions, I doubt anyone is interested; even in his own time Inman does not seem to have ever been taken very seriously away from the fringe, and 140 years of archæological discoveries around the peoples, languages and religions of the ancient Near East have shown many of his conjectures to be at best ingenious but wrong. Instead I will once again direct readers to the comments I made on another blog last year.
Doubtless there are many uncorrected OCR errors in the above documents; but right now I really can't face giving them even another skimming over.
2010-10-07
In Man we Trust? (2)
2010-09-29
In Man we Trust?
2010-08-27
O circule stellarum . . .
In writing it I had in mind the reconstructed classical Latin pronunication that can be found in Latin dictionaries and grammars. The rendition of the Anthem, though, makes no pretence at any Latin verse metre; treat it as if it were English iambic pentameter. I am still far from satisfied by my rendition of the Quia Patris.
In accordance with the short comment on The Book of the Law I am not going to discuss issues of interpretation arising from my translation of quotations from Liber Legis in the Mass. This does not extend to correction of simple grammatical errors.
To my knowledge, this ritual has been performed twice, the first time being by AVoD Oasis OTO in March 2005. There are currently tentative plans for a third performance at the Gnosis IVxviii gathering later this year.
2010-08-22
This is it, which philosophie dreameth of (2)
Forgot to mention this on the blog at the time, but have uploaded some more materials relating to "Enochian Magic" to scribd.
The Angelicall Alphabet of Dr. Dee shows the letters of the "Enochian" alphabet based on Dee's copy of the corrected final forms, along with relevant excerpts from the Spirit Diaries concerning the "primitiue diuine or Angelicall speche" and the names of the letters (several of which Regardie and those copying him managed to get wrong).
Bibliographia Enochia is simply a bibliography of primary and secondary sources on the subject, under sporadic review / update. It makes no pretence to completeness, and is limited to works on the subject in English.
The photograph shows a half-size rendition of the Table of Practice plus other accessories made by yours truly (I can occasionally be induced to actually make physically manifested things), the table being backed onto a folding game-board for portability.
2010-08-11
Falsely attributed? (3)
While I completely agree with the author's case that the identification of "Sha Rocco" with Hargrave Jennings is utterly implausible, it seems he was still caught up in confusion arising from (a) some deliberately dishonest titling by opportunistic publishers of the late 19th century and (b) Cat Yronwode's comments in 2003 or earlier on a book which she had not actually read at the time.
Ascribing the association between "Sha Rocco" and "Abisha S. Hudson" to an "anonymous librarian" suggests that the only basis for it is a manuscript note on the title page of one library copy—in fact, on the reverse of the title page of the 1874 Masculine Cross it was stated that Hudson had entered the book "in the office of the Librarian of Congress," and the only plausible reason for the name of Dr. Hudson (for whom there is far more biographical data now generally available than Ms. Yronwode was able to find in 2003) being on the copyright notice, other than his being the author, or at the very least personally associated with the author, was that he was an employee of the New York based publisher, which is not credible given what is known about him (e.g., that he was a doctor living variously in Ohio and California).
The connection of The Masculine Cross with the 1889-91 "Nature Worship and Mystical Series," is not as simple as Ms. Yronwode assumed. The tenth and last volume of that series had on its cover the title Masculine Cross. It was not, however, a reprint of the 1874 work; rather an opportunistic re-use of the earlier volume's short title. It seems likely that the 1874 Masculine Cross, while being distributed across the USA, was for some time known more by reputation than actual acquaintence in Britain, and that in 1880 an opportunistic publisher in London stole the name and several passages of the text for a small octavo volume called on its title page, Phallic Worship: A Description of the Mysteries of the Sex Worship of the Ancients with the history of the Masculine Cross, but simply The Masculine Cross on the front board and spine. The binding of this latter volume is similar but not identical to that later adopted for the NW&MS and internal typographical and layout style is completely different.
(Page images of the 1874 and 1891 works (in their 1904 reprints) may be found on the Internet Archive. The 1880 work appears rarer and just has a brief entry on Google Books with a spurious attribution to Jennings.)
My reasons for rejecting the widespread attribution of the "Nature Worship and Mystical Series" itself to Hargrave Jennings have been discussed at length in various places, including the endnotes to the Unspeakable Press (Leng) editions of those volumes and in an earlier post on this blog, and include considerations of style, ideas, and dates.
What I have not examined is the question of, since Abisha S. Hudson was a real person and not a pseudonym of Jennings, and also alive at the time the NW&MS was published, could he have been the author of the series, as the author of the post that prompted these ramblings (on a blog about Emma Hardinge Britten, the Spiritualist) seems to assume? Part of Cat Yronwode's argument for Rocco / Hudson being Jennings was that Ophiolatreia, the second volume of the NW&MS was ascribed to "Abisha S. Hudson" by Gershon Legman, a generally reputable bibliographer; and internal references within the series indicate it as being all by one author.
This I cannot answer definitely at the moment, but it seems unlikely; while judgements on style are of limited value given how much of the NW&MS was verbatim from earlier works, style of those passages which do seem to be due to the actual "author" is unlike that found in the Rocco / Hudson Masculine Cross, and the sources employed and general focus of the studies (specifically the recurring emphasis on India as a supposed centre of "phallic worship" tending to suggest a hidden agenda of justifying British colonial policy there as a so-called civilising force) as well as the simple fact that the whole series was published in London make it more likely that the author was British, and a wide range of sources was used whereas the 1874 Masculine Cross was, saving the last chapter, almost entirely cribbed from Dr. Thomas Inman's Ancient Faiths Embodied in Ancient Names.
2010-07-16
Falsely attributed? (2)
The specific claim that the tables of 777 were lifted almost in their entirity from a GD MS. titled "General Correspondences" was made by Pat Zalewski in Kabbalah of the Golden Dawn (xiii, 92 n.); Zalewski referred again to "General Correspondences" in later books; however unless and until a copy of this MS. predating the publication of 777 is published or otherwise made available for general examination it will be impossible to tell for certain just how much if anything in the tables of 777 was due to AC.
2010-07-13
Falsely attributed?
P.S.: To clarify: the full name of the organisation alluded to above is "The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Outer Order of the Rosicrucian Order of the Alpha et Omega." It is apparently not the same as The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (R) established by Charles "Chic" Cicero. Neither should be confused with the historical organisation of that name which was established in London in 1887 or 1888 and messily imploded a little over a decade later.
2010-06-07
Scribd issues
UPDATE 2010.06.07: If a document is not displaying in the new HTML view, it can still be viewed in iPaper, but this involves selecting the "change your reading preferences" link, and then clearing the tickbox "Display documents in HTML mode (recommended)." Obviously it *also* involves having Flash enabled which the known security issues with current versions of Flash is something you may not want to do.
2010-04-07
Divide, add, multiply and understand.
My name contains six and fifty, and yet hath only eight letters; the third is the third part of the fifth, which added to the sixth will produce a number, whose root shall exceed the third itself by just the first, and it is the half of the fourth. Now the fifth and seventh are equal, the last and first also equal, and make with the second as much as the sixth hath, which contains four more than the third tripled.As originally printed by Waite, and apparently in the first publication (1690) of the English translation, this read "contains five and fifty" (I have not had a chance to consult the German original). The amendment had nothing to do with the line in Liber Al vel Legis, and everything to do with the solution to the riddle presented by Waite in his 1924 Brotherhood of the Rosy Cross, (p. 168 note) which makes her name ALCHIMIA, taking the number of each letter as its ordinal position in the English or German alphabet. While Waite's reasoning depends on her response to a later question of the narrator, that the seventh (and thus also the fifth) letter "contains . . . as many as there are lords here," the riddle is soluble without this information, thus: Call the letters of her name a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h. These sum to 56. Since "the fifth and seventh are equal, the last and first also equal"
2a + b + c + d + 2e+ f = 56"the third is the third part of the fifth," to 3c = e, so
2a + b + 7c + d + f = 56"the third . . . added to the sixth, will produce a number whose root shall exceed the third itself by just the first", so,
sqrt(c + f) = c + a". . . and it [the root of c+f, or c+a] is half the fourth" so d = 2(c + a), so
4a + b + 9c + f = 56"the sixth . . . containeth four more than the third tripled" so f = 3c + 4, so
4a + b + 12c + 4 = 56, and sqrt(4c + 4) = c + a, which latter can be rewritten as sqrt 4(c + 1) = c + a, or 2 sqrt (c + 1) = c + a
"the last and the first are also equal, and make with the second, as much as the sixth have."
Slightly ambiguous, could mean a (or h) + b = f, or a + h + b (= 2a+b) = f.
If the former (call this case i) then a + b = 3c + 4, so 3a + 15c + 8 = 56, so 3a + 15c = 48, a + 5c = 16.
If the latter (call this case ii), 2a + b = 3c + 4, so 2a + 15c + 8 = 56, 2a + 15c = 48.
The reference of numbers to letters strongly suggests that a positive integer solution for all the variables is expected. At this point, c + 1 has to be a perfect square; which could make c 3, 8, 15, &c. However if c is more than 3 and a third, a will be negative. So c = 3. In case i, a + 15 = 16, so a = 1. In case ii, 2a + 45 = 48, so a = 1.5, suggesting that the case i reading of the constraint was correct.
So h = 1, e = 9, g = 9, f = 3 x 3 + 4 = 13, b = 12, f = 2(1+3) = 8, giving 1, 12, 3, 8, 9, 13, 9, 1.
By ordinal position in the German or English alphabet (i.e. treating i and j as different letters), ALCHIMIA.
If we do not make the assumption about positive integers, it is not possible to resolve the ambiguity noted. Assuming case 1, we take the equations
2 sqrt (c + 1) = a + c, and a + 5c = 16from the latter, a + c = 16 - 4c; so we can substitute in the first, giving
2 sqrt (c + 1) = 16 - 4c, or sqrt (c + 1) = 8 - 2c c + 1 = 4c^2 - 32c + 64 4c^2 - 33c + 63 = 0which has two real solutions for c, 3 and 5.25.
2010-04-04
This is it, which philosophie dreameth of
Comprising:
48 Claves Angelicæ
The "Enochian" Keys or Calls; Romanised Angelic text with intralineal English translation.
Liber Scientiæ, Auxillii et Victoriæ Terrestris
The table of the 30 Ayres and 91 Parts of the Earth
De Heptarchia Mystica
A system of planetary magick, written / received before the "Enochian" material more narrowly so called. The handwriting on this one is significantly harder to read than the others and some text was lost at the page folds when the MS. book was photographed.
A book of supplications and invocations
Conjurations of the Angels &c. of the Tables of the Watchtowers.
Gotten bored with Anacalypsis at about p. 180 (of 867) of vol. 1. Vol. 2 will be easier but is on scribd as page images from the 1927 reprint already. A bit more of Inman's Ancient Faiths done too, but not much.
I note a few comments consisting entirely of irrelevant links have gotten through the spam filters on this blog. These have been, and will continue to be, deleted on sight. Unfortunately the blog options do not appear to include blocking hyperlinks in comments.
2010-03-23
Tired now . . .
So far I have managed to re-set a bit over a tenth of this work (the preliminaries and first three "books" of vol. i); this can now be read on scribd. Maybe I'll do some more some time; but right now I really need to get a day job.
2010-03-22
Hear thou the voice of the Fire (2)
Also uploaded a revision of the Westcott rendition, mainly fixing a few stylistic inconsistencies and related issues, also clarifying a few of my notes. Percy Bullock's "Introduction" is still omitted from this copy.
I have noticed other re-sets of the Mead edition on Scribd, but they only include the first volume.
2010-03-19
Hmm . . .
Seems someone in Germany has put a copy of the final version of the Geocities page on their homepage. This site is rather heavy with pop-up ads and is flagged yellow by McAfee Site Advisor, so be warned. None of the "direct download" links work either as the only files actually mirrored were the page itself and the logo at the top (not even the stylesheet).
http://janee.cwsurf.de/celephais.press/
Hear thou the voice of the Fire.
Now when will someone reprint (or possibly just pirate and place online) Ruth Majercik's edition of the Oracles which is practically unobtainable?